← All markets

Open 🏛️ Politics General #37209
🎯 One of 7 candidates in the same event. This market trades and resolves entirely on its own -- buying Yes here pays out only if this specific outcome happens, regardless of what happens to the others. Prices across the 7 candidates are not required to add up to 100% -- each one is priced independently, the same way Kalshi/Polymarket's own multi-candidate events work. See all 7 candidates »
💬 Jump to comments

Will the sender of the “I beat Bush” email to Epstein not be revealed in 2026?

Call Yes 81Ᵽ Call No 20Ᵽ
80.50Ᵽ
seed price — no trades yet
Call Yes
—

📡 Polymarket: 87%
Two different numbers on purpose: Polymarket's is the outside reference, Profet's is what actually moves credits here.

🔵 On Polymarket (at import): $4,817 volume

Price history

This platform Polymarket (indicative)
Loading…

Polymarket's price is shown for reference only -- this platform's own order book sets its own price, and the two can diverge.

Log in to trade this market.

Order book

Loading…
Bids
None
Asks
None

How much do you disagree with this price?

Pick 1 (barely) to 5 (strongly) -- a pure sentiment vote, not a trade, not tied to credits.

Log in to add your own rating.

No one's rated this yet -- be the first.

Resolution

Source
Polymarket (via UMA optimistic oracle) ✓ Verified source
Event cutoff
Rules
On February 12, 2026, Rep. Ro Khanna posted a document on X that displays an email with the subject line "I beat Bush" addressed to Jeffrey Epstein, calling for the sender’s identity to be unredacted. You can read more about that here: https://x.com/reprokhanna/status/2022046192478327156

This market will resolve to the individual whose email account is confirmed to have sent the specified message by December 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET.

If no individual's email account is confirmed to have sent the message by the end date, this market will resolve to "Not revealed in 2026".

The identity of the account must be revealed unambiguously, for example, through a public unredaction of the document in question, which clearly and definitively reveals the sender’s address.

Official statements regarding the sender’s identity, or any confirmation that does not involve public unredaction of the specified document, including access limited to House members, congressional committees, or other restricted parties, will qualify only if there is a broad consensus as to their truthfulness.

The resolution source for this market will be a consensus of credible reporting.

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

No comments yet -- be the first to say something.