← All markets

Open 💻 Tech & AI General #40629
💬 Jump to comments

Will OpenAI or Anthropic announces it has achieved recursive self-improvement before Jan 1, 2027?

Call Yes 21Ᵽ Call No 79Ᵽ
21.00Ᵽ
seed price — no trades yet
Call Yes
19.00Ᵽ – 23.00Ᵽ
Call No
77.00Ᵽ – 81.00Ᵽ

📡 Kalshi: 21%
Two different numbers on purpose: Kalshi's is the outside reference, Profet's is what actually moves credits here.

19.00Ᵽ best bid · 23.00Ᵽ best ask

🟢 On Kalshi (at import): $1,059 volume
💰 20.00 contract(s) resting 👁 5 views ⚡ Instant liquidity via Quick Bet

Price history

This platform
Loading…

Log in to trade this market.

Order book

Loading…
Bids
10.00 19.00Ᵽ Log in
Call No 10.00 @ 81.00Ᵽ · if correct: +190.00Ᵽ · if wrong: −810.00Ᵽ
Asks
10.00 23.00Ᵽ Log in
Call Yes 10.00 @ 23.00Ᵽ · if correct: +770.00Ᵽ · if wrong: −230.00Ᵽ

How much do you disagree with this price?

Pick 1 (barely) to 5 (strongly) -- a pure sentiment vote, not a trade, not tied to credits.

Log in to add your own rating.

No one's rated this yet -- be the first.

Resolution

Source
Kalshi ✓ Verified source
Event cutoff
Rules
If OpenAI or Anthropic announces it has achieved recursive self-improvement before Jan 1, 2027, then the market resolves to Yes.

The statement must describe an achieved capability in which the company's AI autonomously conducts the research and development needed to materially improve the general capabilities of its most capable or near-frontier AI systems, or produce a more capable successor, with the improved system able to drive further such improvements.

Toy, narrow, sandboxed, proof-of-concept, prompt, skill, or benchmark-only improvements do not qualify. Humans may provide high-level goals, resources, oversight, and approval, but must not supply the substantive research choices or technical solution.

The capability must be affirmatively described as currently achieved in an official company communication or by an executive or research leader speaking about the company's capabilities. Future plans, speculation, offhand remarks, interviewer characterizations, leaks, model outputs, and third-party claims do not qualify.

A public release, named model, technical demonstration, or independent verification is not required.

Comments

Log in to join the discussion.

No comments yet -- be the first to say something.